Skip to main content

Independent journalism powered by readers like you.

Boeing Engineers Who Warned About the 737 MAX Before Disaster

criticalongoingBy OPV Investigations||10 min read

Boeing engineers raised repeated concerns about the 737 MAX MCAS system before two crashes killed 346 people. Internal communications revealed engineers described the aircraft as designed by clowns supervised by monkeys. The MCAS system relied on a single angle-of-attack sensor without redundancy. Whistleblowers described a corporate culture where schedule pressures overrode engineering safety judgments.

Engineering Warnings Ignored

Internal messages revealed engineers expressing serious concerns about MCAS during development. One engineer wrote he would not put his family on the aircraft. Engineers requested additional redundancy for the angle-of-attack sensor system, but requests were denied based on cost and timeline considerations. The single-sensor design meant a faulty reading could trigger uncommanded nose-down pitch commands with no backup.

FAA Delegation Failures

The FAA's Organization Designation Authorization allowed Boeing to designate its own employees to conduct safety certification. Whistleblowers described management pressuring designated employees to approve certifications on schedule. The FAA lacked sufficient staff to independently verify Boeing's safety analyses and was unaware of key MCAS design changes.

Ongoing Safety Concerns

Even after recertification, whistleblowers continue raising concerns about manufacturing quality. Reports of loose bolts, missing rivets, and door plug failures suggest systemic quality control issues. Boeing's 2024 door plug blowout on Alaska Airlines renewed scrutiny of manufacturing processes.

Key Findings

  • Boeing engineers described the 737 MAX as designed by clowns supervised by monkeys in internal communications
  • The MCAS system relied on a single angle-of-attack sensor without redundancy despite engineer requests for backup
  • FAA delegated certification allowed Boeing to essentially self-certify the safety system that caused two fatal crashes

Timeline

Lion Air Flight 610 crashes killing 189 people

Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302 crashes killing 157 people

Internal Boeing communications released showing safety concerns

Alaska Airlines door plug blowout renews scrutiny

Affected Parties

346 crash victims and familiesBoeing engineering staffFAA certification authorityGlobal aviation safety

SeekerPro

Unlock Premium Intelligence. $15.99/mo. Cancel anytime.

Learn more →

NexusBro

Audit any website in 60 seconds. Free QA report.

Learn more →

BliniBot

AI task automation. 5 free queries. No signup.

Learn more →

Related Reports

Frances Haugen: Three Years After the Facebook PapersAmazon Warehouse Workers Expose Dangerous Injury RatesGoogle AI Ethics Team Firings: Silencing Internal DissentThe Uber Files: How a Tech Giant Captured GovernmentsOpenAI Safety Team Mass Exodus Signals AlarmSnowden Legacy: Mass Surveillance in the Age of AIClearview AI Employees Raise Alarms on Facial RecognitionScale AI Data Workers Expose Below-Minimum-Wage Conditions

Explore Across Platforms

OPHGoogle Corporate ProfileNoizzCompare Privacy Tools

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the MCAS system?
MCAS was software compensating for handling changes from larger engines on the 737 MAX. It relied on a single sensor without redundancy, meaning a faulty reading could trigger uncommanded nose-down commands.
Did Boeing know the MAX was dangerous?
Internal communications revealed engineers expressing serious safety concerns, with one writing he would not put his family on the aircraft. Requests for additional sensor redundancy were denied due to cost and schedule.
Has Boeing fixed its safety culture?
Boeing made MCAS modifications but ongoing incidents including a 2024 door plug blowout suggest systemic quality control issues persist. Whistleblowers continue reporting manufacturing deficiencies.

SeekerPro

Unlock Premium Intelligence. $15.99/mo. Cancel anytime.

Learn more →

NexusBro

Audit any website in 60 seconds. Free QA report.

Learn more →

BliniBot

AI task automation. 5 free queries. No signup.

Learn more →

Sources

Stay informed. Take action.

Join the community holding corporations accountable.

Join 23,000+ readers who trust OPV for independent analysis

Cancel anytime. No commitment required.

Tools We Recommend

Is your website performing?

Free AI-powered QA audit. Find and fix issues in minutes.

Run Free Audit

Automate your marketing

AI-powered content creation, scheduling, and analytics.

Try Free

AI assistant that acts

Chat, automate tasks, browse the web. Your AI agent.

Chat Now

Want the Full Story?

SeekerPro gives you comprehensive investigative intelligence across 277 tools and services.

Try SeekerPro Free for 14 Days

$15.99/mo after trial. Cancel anytime.

Get the Inside Scoop

Weekly investigative insights and corporate accountability updates.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Visit Blossend.com →

Explore the full portfolio of independent AI tools and editorial properties at blossend.com.